Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376113›Full record

ArticleNEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery2023

Implementing an Automated Prediction Model to Improve Prescribing of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis.

Douglas S Krakower, Michael Lieberman, Miguel Marino, Jun Hwang, Kenneth H Mayer, Julia L Marcus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Douglas S KrakowerAttending Physician, Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Research Scientist, The Fenway Institute at Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael LiebermanMedical Director, Population Health, OCHIN, Portland, Oregon, USA; Associate Professor, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Miguel MarinoAssociate Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; Associate Professor, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jun HwangBiostatistician, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kenneth H MayerMedical Research Director, The Fenway Institute at Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Attending Physician, Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Julia L MarcusAssociate Professor, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Adjunct Faculty, The Fenway Institute at Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Predictive Analytics and Clinical Decision Support to Improve PrEP Prescribing in Community Health Centers (PrEDICT)R01MH133515 · NIMH · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI KRAKOWER, DOUGLAS SCOTT, MARCUS, JULIA L. · 2023 to 2024
$1.5M
EHR-Based Prediction Models to Improve PrEP Use in Community Health CentersR34MH122291 · NIMH · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI KRAKOWER, DOUGLAS SCOTT, MARCUS, JULIA L. · 2020 to 2022
$743k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133515NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH122291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is nearly 100% effective at decreasing HIV acquisition but is underused in priority populations. Primary care clinicians need tools to help them identify persons likely to benefit from PrEP use and prescribe it when appropriate. The researchers developed and validated an automated decision support tool with interactive alerts in the electronic health record to increase PrEP discussions and prescribing in primary care. They piloted the tool at three federally qualified health centers and assessed feasibility, acceptance by clinicians, and preliminary impact on PrEP care. Of 33,803 patients who visited the pilot clinics from July 2022 through January 2023, providers received PrEP alerts at the point of care for 2.2% of patients, demonstrating feasibility. Although numbers of PrEP prescriptions remained low, the proportion of all patients with new PrEP prescriptions was 4.5 times higher at pilot clinics compared with matched control clinics (0.09% vs. 0.02%). Implementation of the decision support tool was associated with a statistically nonsignificant 5.5% increase in HIV tests per 100 patients. In qualitative interviews, providers said the tool facilitated PrEP discussions with patients, particularly for those patients who would not have initiated discussions because of stigma. The researchers found that acceptance, use, and impact of machine-learning models for PrEP depends on collaborating with and building trust among providers, including blending a data-driven approach to identifying patients at increased risk for HIV acquisition with providers' traditional decision-making framework. These approaches could be useful for health care organizations seeking to implement automated prediction models across all areas of medicine.

Identifiers

PMID40376113
PMCPMC12080344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.