ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2025
Scrutinizing the Perspective of Family Physician Teams After the first Decade of Implementation of Urban Family Physician Program: A Thematic Qualitative Study from Iran.
Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urban Family Physician Program (UFPP) passed the first ten years of its age in Iran. In this study, we aimed to determine the strengths and challenges of this program from the viewpoints of family physician (FP) teams to address comprehensive evidences and solutions for its improvement. Methods: In this qualitative study, using purposeful sampling, 58 members of FP teams from ten cities of Fars province were interviewed. In-depth semistructured phone interviews were performed. The trustworthiness of data was checked using Guba and Lincoln criteria. Results: Interviewees' mean years of working in UFPP was 6.9 ± 3.5 years. Themes of challenges included: Inefficient governance, Challenging information system, Fragile financing system, Inefficient service provision, Inefficient Health Workforce, and Inadequate medical products and technologies. Themes of strengths included: Improving governance, Comprehensive information system, Improved quality of service delivery, Improved health workforce conditions, Curbing the costs of health systems, and Capability of application of new technologies. The bulk of views were toward challenges compared with the strengths. Conclusions: After the first decade of running UFPP and regardless of some contradictory opinions among family physician teams, the challenges of this program outweigh its strengths. These evidences address the need for a fundamental reform in this program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.