SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
Risk factors for poor bereavement outcomes and the support needs of adult bereaved refugees within the psychosocial-cultural concept of personhood: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The majority of refugees are exposed to trauma and multiple deaths and often face difficulties in coping with the death of someone close to them. This review aimed to systematically synthesize evidence regarding the risk factors associated with poor bereavement outcomes and the support needs of refugees during bereavement, using the ring theory of personhood as a guiding framework to inform service provision and policy development. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using five citation databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, SocINDEX, MEDLINE, and Web of Science), along with gray literature sources, to explore the bereavement support needs of refugees worldwide. The review followed the ring theory of personhood framework. A standardized data extraction tool (34) was used to analyse studies that included adult refugees who had experienced the death of a family member/friend. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies to reduce bias. Due to the heterogeneity across the included studies, a narrative synthesis was conducted independently by two reviewers, with consensus reached on the final analysis. Results: A total of 11 studies (eight quantitative, two mixed-methods, and one qualitative) were eligible for inclusion, representing a combined sample of 3,053 refugees. Across the rings of personhood, various risk factors related to bereavement were identified, including female sex, age, comorbidities, cultural and religious beliefs/values, and social factors. The findings indicate that refugees would benefit from culturally sensitive diagnostic tools for the early detection of grief symptoms, along with psycho-socio-cultural bereavement support interventions. Such interventions could enhance healthcare providers' understanding of refugees' perspectives, values, and preferences, thereby improving the quality of care provided. Conclusion: This review identified a wide range of culturally sensitive assessments and support needs for bereaved refugees. A personalized approach to bereavement assessment and care is recommended to facilitate a more comprehensive and existential understanding of bereavement and grief in research, clinical practice, policymaking, and community-based support systems. Further research is warranted to examine the long-term effects of bereavement on refugees' mental health and to explore strategies for providing sustained support throughout the refugee journey. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022370126, Identifier CRD42022370126.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.