Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376026›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic metastases of renal cell carcinoma.

Morgane Stouvenot, Stephane Koch, Alexandre Frontzcak, Christelle D'Engremont, Aurélien Boinette, Alexandre Doussot, Tristan Maurina, Lucine Vuitton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Methodology Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA) for Pancreatic Neoplasms: Results From an International Survey.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Morgane StouvenotGastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Stephane KochGastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Alexandre FrontzcakUrology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Christelle D'EngremontCHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Aurélien BoinetteGastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Alexandre DoussotDigestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Tristan MaurinaOncology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Lucine VuittonGastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are usually managed surgically but with significant morbidity. As an alternative, endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has shown promising results in treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of our study was to assess technical success, effectiveness, and safety of EUS-RFA in patients with pancreatic metastases of RCC. Patients and methods: This retrospective, observational study included consecutive patients referred for EUS-RFA of pancreatic RCC metastases. EUS-RFA was performed through 18G or 19G dedicated RFA needles. Effectiveness of EUS-RFA treatment was defined by necrosis with no contrast enhancement or lesion disappearance, determined by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan, at 2 to 5 months post procedure, 1 year, and at the end of follow-up. Safety was assessed per and post procedure. Results: Between January 2015 and January 2021, eight patients with 11 lesions were treated and median time from RCC diagnosis to pancreatic metastases RFA was 8.5 years (1-15). Mean lesion size was 13.9 mm (± 3.9). Technical success assessed by immediate post procedure contrast-enhanced CT or Doppler was 100%. At the first CT scan follow-up, complete response was 45.4% and partial response was 27.3%. At 1 year, complete response was 45.4% and partial response was 27.3%. Three patients had multiple EUS-RFAs. Adverse events occurred in 3 patients (mild acute pancreatitis, abdominal pain, and pancreatic fistula with retro-gastric pseudocyst). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of EUS-RFA for patients with pancreatic metastases of RCC.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasonographyIntervention EUSPancreas

Identifiers

PMID40376026
PMCPMC12080524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.