ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Interobserver variability in lymph node evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography in cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasound for lymph node diagnosis: perspective on an evolving frontier.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound for Nodal Staging in Patients with Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Accurate preoperative lymph node (LN) assessment is crucial for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) because presence of LN metastases significantly reduces survival rates and can contraindicate surgical resection. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) provides a reliable method for LN assessment with the advantage of enabling tissue acquisition for pathological confirmation. This study aimed to assess interobserver agreement among endosonographers in evaluating LN characteristics in patients with iCCA and pCCA. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 24 endosonographers. Participants reviewed 42 EUS images from iCCA and pCCA patients, classifying LNs based on six characteristics (demarcation, shape, echogenicity, homogeneity, suspiciousness, and need to retrieve tissue). Interobserver agreement was determined using Light's kappa statistics. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in identifying malignant LNs were calculated. Results: Overall kappa values indicated moderate to fair agreement on LN characteristics, with Kappa values of 0.24 for demarcation, 0.45 for shape, 0.38 for echogenicity, 0.52 for homogeneity, and 0.36 for suspiciousness. Overall accuracy of endosonographers in correctly identifying malignant LNs was 62%, with individual accuracy ranging from 44 to 75%. Sensitivity was 60% (range: 29%-90%) and specificity was 64% (range: 28%-89%). Conclusions: Endosonographic assessment of LN morphology and characterization demonstrates considerable variability among endosonographers. Thus, there is a clear need for standardization in preoperative LN evaluation, including establishing consensus about when to perform tissue acquisition, based on objective criteria such as short-axis diameter. Further research is required to refine and optimize these guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.