Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40376021›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Use of artificial intelligence to measure colorectal polyp size without a reference object.

Chin-Yuan Yii, Ding-Ek Toh, Tzu-An Chen, Wei-Lun Hsu, Huang-Jen Lai, Yin-Chen Wang, Chang-Ru Liu, Yow-Chii Kuo, Shih-Hao Young, Fu-Ming Chang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reply to Koulaouzidis and Marlicz.Endoscopy international open · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chin-Yuan YiiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2403-3857
Ding-Ek TohDepartment of Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia.
Tzu-An ChenDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wei-Lun HsuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Huang-Jen LaiDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yin-Chen WangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang-Ru LiuNursing Department, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yow-Chii KuoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Shih-Hao YoungDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Fu-Ming ChangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landseed International Medical Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chen LinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Zhongli, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Polyp size is crucial for determining colonoscopy surveillance intervals. We present an artificial intelligence (AI) model for colorectal polyp size measurement without a reference object. Methods: The regression model for polyp size estimation was developed using outputs from two SegFormer models, segmentation and depth estimation. Initially built on colonoscopic images of polyp phantoms, the model underwent transfer learning with 1,304 real-world images. Testing was conducted on 178 images from 52 polyps, independent of the training set, using a snare as the ground truth for size comparison with the AI-based model. Polyps were classified into three size groups: ≤ 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm. Error rates were calculated to evaluate discrepancies in actual size values between the AI model and the snare method. Precision indicated the positive predictive value per size group and recall and Bland-Altman were also conducted. Results: The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.03 mm between methods, with limits of agreement from -1.654 mm to 1.596 mm. AI model error rates for actual size discrepancies were 10.74%, 12.36%, and 9.89% for the ≤ 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm groups, respectively, averaging 11.47%. Precision values were 0.870, 0.911, and 0.857, with overall recall of 0.846. Conclusions: Our study shows that colorectal polyp size measurement by AI model is practical and clinically useful, exhibiting low error rates and high precision. AI shows promise as an accurate tool for measurement without the need for a reference object during screening colonoscopy.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerCRC screeningEndoscopy Lower GI TractPolyps / adenomas / ...

Identifiers

PMID40376021
PMCPMC12080523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.