SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025
The neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-metastatic mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Integrative Multiomics and Single-Cell Analyses Identify FKBP10 as a Predictor of Radiotherapy Outcome in Colorectal Cancer.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer: current treatment paradigms, limitations and future perspectives.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunotherapy has become the first-line treatment for metastatic mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancer remain unclear. In this article, we explore the clinical effect and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancer. Methods: We collected clinical data from the databases (PubMed, Wanfang Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases) up to November 2024. The primary outcomes of major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), and other outcomes were analyzed for the final results. The secondary outcomes (pCR rates for the subgroups) were also analyzed. Results: We included 21 articles with 628 non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancers. A pCR was found in 320/480 (66.6%) patients [effect size (ES): 0.70, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.74] with the fixed-effects model and little heterogeneity. A MPR was found in 388/452 (85.8%) patients (ES: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91) with the fixed-effects model and little heterogeneity. In the subgroup analysis, pCR rates were similar in the T1-T3 group and T4a-T4b group in the fixed-effects model with minimal heterogeneity (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.22). The pCR rates were similar in the colon cancer group and rectal cancer group in the fixed-effects model with minimal heterogeneity (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.39 to 5.12). Similar pCR rates were found in the immune monotherapy group and immune therapy plus chemotherapy group (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.10) with the fixed-effects model and little heterogeneity. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy achieves high rates of pCR and MPR for non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancer. For locally advanced T4 stage dMMR colorectal cancer, neoadjuvant immunotherapy can still achieve good pCR rates. Neoadjuvant immune monotherapy can achieve good pCRs rates, avoiding the toxic side effects caused by combined dual immunotherapy and chemo(radio)therapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be another treatment option for non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancer. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024594173.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.