ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2025
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients with Joint Prostheses: Variability in Dentists' Practices and the Need for Guidance.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: With increasing life expectancy, the incidence of degenerative and inflammatory joint diseases continues to rise. These conditions are major indications for orthopedic prostheses, which pose risks of postoperative complications, particularly infections of orthopedic prostheses (IPO). Dental infections have been considered a potential source of these infections, and recommendations regarding the use of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) during dental procedures have evolved over time. Current guidelines discourage the routine use of AP. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of private-sector dentists in the cities of Rabat, Temara, and Salé (Morocco) regarding the dental management of patients with orthopedic prostheses, particularly the use of AP. Methodology: An anonymous 21-question survey was distributed to 310 dentists practicing in these cities. The collected responses were analyzed using JamoviR software (version 2.3.25), with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed to compare different groups. Results: Out of 310 distributed questionnaires, 102 valid responses were retained (response rate: 32.9%). Among respondents, 53.9% considered patients with joint prostheses at risk of infection, yet only 47.1% reported prescribing AP. Female practitioners and those with over 20 years of experience were significantly more likely to prescribe AP (p=0.047 and p=0.002, respectively). Dentists who did not consult guidelines or attend professional conferences were also more prone to prescribing AP during endodontic procedures (p=0.017 and p=0.018). Conclusion: This study reveals inconsistent knowledge and practices among dentists regarding AP use for patients with joint prostheses. Given the misalignment with current guidelines and the influence of outdated sources of information, targeted educational interventions and updated clinical guidelines are urgently needed to promote evidence-based practices. Clear, standardized guidelines are also essential to prevent the unjustified overprescription of antibiotics and to address the growing concern of antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.