Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375959›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasonography2025

Teaching methods, facilities, and institutions in student ultrasound education (SUSE): e-learning, simulation, and ultrasound skills labs.

Nils Daum, Jannis Schwanemann, Michael Blaivas, Michael Ignacio Prats, Roman Hari, Beatrice Hoffmann, Christian Jenssen, Alexander Krutz, Claudia Lucius, Ricarda Neubauer and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasonography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nils DaumDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin wand Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6324-1747
Jannis SchwanemannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0729-8102
Michael BlaivasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7196-9765
Michael Ignacio PratsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1736-7912
Roman HariInstitute for Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-9056
Beatrice HoffmannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-9430
Christian JenssenInstitute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-6650
Alexander KrutzInstitute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1402-7492
Claudia LuciusOutpatient Department of Gastroenterology, IBD centre Helios Hospital Berlin - Buch, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-011X
Ricarda NeubauerBonn, University Hospital, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-8988
Florian ReckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9135-4338
Roxana SirliDepartment of Internal Medicine II - Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center of Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0179-1014
Susan Cambell WesterwaySchool of Dentistry & Medical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-073X
Constantinos ZervidesMedical Physics and Dosimetry Services LTD, CZMH, Cyprus.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7708-3698
Dieter NürnbergInstitute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3594-8284
Gregor BarthDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9423-9869
Nasenien Nourkami-TutdibiHospital of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Medical Center, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4240-1868
Christoph Frank DietrichDepartment General Internal Medicine, Hirslanden Clinics Beau-Site, Salem and Permancence, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6015-6347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To acquire ultrasound skills, students need access to educational resources for both theoretical and practical knowledge. Effective training depends on the availability of educational content, training opportunities, and facilities - all of which are often scarce. E-learning platforms, simulation, and ultrasound skills labs are potential solutions to complement supervised real-life bedside training on patients and improve ultrasound education. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of e-learning, simulation, and ultrasound skills labs in the specific context of student education. E-learning platforms and teaching videos support students by offering flexible, accessible learning, allowing them to engage with material at their own pace. These digital resources complement practical lessons by providing essential theoretical knowledge that can be applied during hands-on sessions. Simulation creates a controlled environment for skill development and enhances patient safety, especially during interventional procedures. However, simulation equipment's high cost and technical complexity strain budgets and require specialized staff and training. Simulators often fail to replicate real-life variability, limiting skill transfer to patient care. The establishment of ultrasound skills labs offers a solid, long-term opportunity for skill retention but requires sufficient and sustainable funding. In conclusion, e-learning, simulation, and ultrasound skills labs can be valuable components of student ultrasound education if used deliberately. They should be included in a blended medical curriculum incorporating real-world clinical experiences to ensure effective transfer of learning to clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceeducationstudentstelemedicineultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40375959
PMCPMC12080558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.