ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Fertility Preservation and Treatment Coverage Among United States Plastic Surgery Trainees.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most plastic surgery trainees spend their fertile years in training, and many often delay childbearing due to the demands of residency. This study sought to assess the awareness and desire for fertility preservation in this cohort, and the institutional coverage of fertility services. Methods: An American Council of Educators in Plastic Surgery-approved survey was distributed to plastic surgery trainees via email. The survey assessed respondents' current or future plans for childbearing, reasons for postponing childbearing, education of and attitude toward oocyte freezing, financial ability to pursue oocyte freezing, and perceived training program attitude toward childbearing. Results: A total of 118 responses were received. Of the respondents, 75.4% were women. A total of 66% reported feeling the need to postpone pregnancy due to residency, citing residency schedules being too demanding, limited parental leave, and concern for the availability of child care as the most commonly reported reasons for postponing childbearing. A total of 45.8% reported that they would consider freezing oocytes to preserve fertility, and another 16% identified as male but reported they would consider discussing oocyte freezing with a female partner. A total of 85.6% of respondents had not received education during training regarding fertility preservation. A total of 17.8% reported that fertility preservation was offered through the insurance provided by their training program, whereas 55.1% reported that they would pursue fertility preservation if covered. Conclusions: Plastic surgery trainees often postpone having children due to the demands of their training. This delay increases the risk of infertility and pregnancy complications. Although fertility preservation would benefit this group, there is lack of education and access.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.