Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375899›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Investigating antibiotics in the NICU and patient safety.

Shelley M Lawrence, James L Wynn, David W Kimberlin, Joseph B Cantey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shelley M LawrenceDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
James L WynnDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
David W KimberlinDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Joseph B CanteyDivision of Neonatology, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, a number of observational studies have been published in neonatology-focused journals that modify American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) evidence-based guidelines, as outlined in the Red Book and other publications authored by the AAP Committee on the Fetus and Newborn and the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases, for the treatment of neonatal infectious diseases. Specifically, studies that decrease the treatment length or advocate for the early transition of intravenous to oral antibiotics in all neonates with suspected or culture-positive sepsis or pneumonia should be regarded with caution. These studies are usually conducted through quality improvement initiatives without informed parental consent, and lack well-defined definitions for the infection of interest. They often fail to include sufficient information regarding well-documented variations in gestational age-based immune responses, and usually combine bacterial infections into a single group without considering virulence and pathophysiologic differences between gram-negative and gram-positive infections. We seek to raise awareness of the potential harm these practices may cause and to advocate for parental involvement and consent when deviations from practice standards are investigated.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPatient SafetyHumansInfant, NewbornSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic utilizationantimicrobial stewardshipneonatal infectionparental consentpatient safety - standardsRedbook guidelinesstudy design and best practice

Identifiers

PMID40375899
PMCPMC12078257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.