ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Breast tumor diagnosis via multimodal deep learning using ultrasound B-mode and Nakagami images.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Introduction to the JMI Special Issue on Advances in Breast Imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We propose and evaluate multimodal deep learning (DL) approaches that combine ultrasound (US) B-mode and Nakagami parametric images for breast tumor classification. It is hypothesized that integrating tissue brightness information from B-mode images with scattering properties from Nakagami images will enhance diagnostic performance compared with single-input approaches. Approach: An EfficientNetV2B0 network was used to develop multimodal DL frameworks that took as input (i) numerical two-dimensional (2D) maps or (ii) rendered red-green-blue (RGB) representations of both B-mode and Nakagami data. The diagnostic performance of these frameworks was compared with single-input counterparts using 831 US acquisitions from 264 patients. In addition, gradient-weighted class activation mapping was applied to evaluate diagnostically relevant information utilized by the different networks. Results: The multimodal architectures demonstrated significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ( Conclusions: Incorporating B-mode and Nakagami information together in a multimodal DL framework improved classification outcomes and increased the amount of diagnostically relevant information accessed by networks, highlighting the potential for automating and standardizing US breast cancer diagnostics to enhance clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.