ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Enhancing breast cancer detection on screening mammogram using self-supervised learning and a hybrid deep model of Swin Transformer and convolutional neural networks.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speeding Up the Discovery of Optimal Feature Combinations for Omics Data Based on Pseudo-Kernel Function.Research square · 2026Article
- Explainable Breast Cancer Detection Using Hierarchical Multi-Scale and Edge-Aware Transformer Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep-learning based adaptive fusion of CC and MLO views for improved mammographic cancer diagnosis.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Sequential Transfer Learning for Multi-Domain Breast Image Segmentation Using a Transformer-Enhanced Hybrid U-Net.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A deep learning framework for breast cancer diagnosis using Swin Transformer and Dual-Attention Multi-scale Fusion Network.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance of federated versus centralized learning for mammography classification across film-digital domain shift.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Article
- Introduction to the JMI Special Issue on Advances in Breast Imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The scarcity of high-quality curated labeled medical training data remains one of the major limitations in applying artificial intelligence systems to breast cancer diagnosis. Deep models for mammogram analysis and mass (or micro-calcification) detection require training with a large volume of labeled images, which are often expensive and time-consuming to collect. To reduce this challenge, we proposed a method that leverages self-supervised learning (SSL) and a deep hybrid model, named HybMNet, which combines local self-attention and fine-grained feature extraction to enhance breast cancer detection on screening mammograms. Approach: Our method employs a two-stage learning process: (1) SSL pretraining: We utilize Efficient Self-Supervised Vision Transformers, an SSL technique, to pretrain a Swin Transformer (Swin-T) using a limited set of mammograms. The pretrained Swin-T then serves as the backbone for the downstream task. (2) Downstream training: The proposed HybMNet combines the Swin-T backbone with a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based network and a fusion strategy. The Swin-T employs local self-attention to identify informative patch regions from the high-resolution mammogram, whereas the CNN-based network extracts fine-grained local features from the selected patches. A fusion module then integrates global and local information from both networks to generate robust predictions. The HybMNet is trained end-to-end, with the loss function combining the outputs of the Swin-T and CNN modules to optimize feature extraction and classification performance. Results: The proposed method was evaluated for its ability to detect breast cancer by distinguishing between benign (normal) and malignant mammograms. Leveraging SSL pretraining and the HybMNet model, it achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.852, 0.875) on the Chinese Mammogram Database (CMMD) dataset and 0.889 (95% CI: 0.875, 0.903) on the INbreast dataset, highlighting its effectiveness. Conclusions: The quantitative results highlight the effectiveness of our proposed HybMNet and the SSL pretraining approach. In addition, visualizations of the selected region of interest patches show the model's potential for weakly supervised detection of microcalcifications, despite being trained using only image-level labels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.