ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Toward consensus: using the Delphi method to form an international expert consensus statement on ultra-processed food addiction.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- State of the Science on Ultra-processed Foods and the Ultra-processed Food Addiction Construct.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- Validating CRAVED: a brief screening instrument for ultra-processed food addiction.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Assessing maladaptive sugar-rich food consumption: development and preliminary validation of the sugar misuse questionnaire.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Food addiction in behavioral addictions: a network approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Case management of ultra-processed food addiction: a theoretical perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Changes in binge eating symptoms following an online community-based ultra-processed food addiction intervention: Liberate.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Abstinence-based treatment of comorbid eating disorders and ultra-processed food addiction.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Ultra-processed food addiction symptoms profile according to weight status among Brazilian adults.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Low carbohydrate and psychoeducational programs show promise for the treatment of ultra-processed food addiction: 12-month follow-up.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recognition of an addictive disorder relating to the harmful use of certain foods is being called for by clinicians and researchers, which evidence supports as being distinct from eating disorders (EDs) and obesity. Critics cite a lack of consensus on the validity of associating the term addiction with food, claiming that characteristics of addiction 'are not observed in the context of eating behaviors' as a reason to dispute its consideration as a novel diagnosis. It was decided to consult international scientific and clinical experts to review whether it would be possible to reach a consensus around this subject. The 12-month project, using a Delphi method, involved 40 clinicians, researchers and academics, from 10 countries and a team of four facilitators. Consensus was achieved between 37 out of the 40 participants. The discussions during the process demonstrated that it was not only possible to achieve several areas of agreement related to the clinical observation of addiction-like symptoms related to certain foods but also, that existing extensive scientific research findings confirm the biochemical, neurological and behavioral aspects of a substance-use disorder relating specifically to ultra-processed foods, exhibiting strong similarities with other acknowledged substance-use disorders. The consensus may provide a platform for future attempts for formal recognition of ultra-processed food addiction as a diagnosis. Areas for future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.