Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375857›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025

Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy for Identifying Sessile Serrated Polyps and Adenomas During Routine Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Ammad Javaid Chaudhary, Muhammad Saad Faisal, Abdullah Sohail, Hope Baldwin, Kevin Harris, Muhammad Shahzil, Muhammad Salman Faisal, Avi Toiv, Keith Mullins, Suraj Suresh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ammad Javaid ChaudharyDepartment of Internal Medicine Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.
Muhammad Saad FaisalDepartment of Internal Medicine Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.
Abdullah SohailDepartment of Internal Medicine University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1240-6441
Hope BaldwinSchool of Medicine Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA.
Kevin HarrisDepartment of Gastroenterology Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.
Muhammad ShahzilDepartment of Internal Medicine Weiss Memorial Hospital Chicago Illinois USA.
Muhammad Salman FaisalDepartment of Gastroenterology Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.
Avi ToivDepartment of Internal Medicine Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.
Keith MullinsDepartment of Gastroenterology Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.
Suraj SureshDepartment of Gastroenterology Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Polyps located in less accessible areas of the colon, such as inner curves of flexures, are often difficult to visualize. Colonoscope attachments such as the Endocuff have been developed to improve the visualization of these polyps. We aimed to assess the utility of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) in the detection of tubular adenomas and sessile serrated polyps (SSP) compared to conventional colonoscopy during routine colorectal cancer screening. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent colorectal cancer screening with either conventional colonoscopy or EAC between November 2022 and March 2023. The primary outcomes were SSP and tubular adenoma detection rates. Secondary outcomes included total procedure time, cecal intubation time, and ileal intubation rates. Results: Of the 435 patients included, 189 (43%) underwent EAC, and 246 (57%) underwent conventional colonoscopy. The mean ± standard deviation number of polyps detected was 1.7 ± 2.2, the mean procedure time was 18.7 ± 7.5 min, and the mean cecal intubation time was 4.4 ± 3.3 min, with no significant differences between groups. A smaller proportion of patients in the EAC group had successful ileal intubation (14% vs. 55%; Conclusion: EAC may enhance the detection of difficult-to-visualize SSPs during screening colonoscopies without affecting overall procedure time. However, physicians should consider the examination indication when selecting EAC, as ileal intubation may be more challenging.

Indexed as

endocuff‐assisted colonoscopyscreening colonoscopysessile serrated polypstubular adenomas

Identifiers

PMID40375857
PMCPMC12078195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.