ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Histological effect of fluoride varnishes on teeth with caries in the white spot phase: An
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the histological remineralization effects of two fluoride varnishes on artificially produced caries lesions in young permanent teeth. Material and Methods: Twenty longitudinal sections of premolars with artificially produced white spot lesions and evaluated with a polarised light microscope. The sample consisted of 20 tooth fragments, which were divided and assigned to two groups: The first group with application of Clinpro TM White Varnish (20 tooth sections) and the second, with MI Varnish TM (20 tooth sections) subjected for 6 days to conditions similar to the oral cavity. The sections were then re-evaluated by calculating the lesion depth and remineralization area (Image J software). Student' s t-test was used to analyse the data. Results: MI Varnish TM fluoride varnish achieved a greater remineralization area than Clinpro TM White Varnish (838042.6±140359.3 μm2 and 678313.8±137265.7μm2, respectively), with a statistically significant difference ( Conclusions: MI Varnish TM had a better effect than Clinpro TM White Varnish in remineralizing lesions, in vitro, in the enamel of young permanent teeth with caries in the white-stained phase.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.