Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375807›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of primatology2025

The Earliest Known Radiation of Pitheciine Primates.

Nelson M Novo, Gabriel M Martin, Laureano R González Ruiz, Marcelo F Tejedor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nelson M NovoInstituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología (CCT CONICET-CENPAT), Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
Gabriel M MartinCentro de Investigación Esquel de Montaña y Estepa Patagónica (CIEMEP, CONICET-UNPSJB), Esquel, Chubut, Argentina.
Laureano R González RuizCentro de Investigación Esquel de Montaña y Estepa Patagónica (CIEMEP, CONICET-UNPSJB), Esquel, Chubut, Argentina.
Marcelo F TejedorDepartamento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-673X

Funding

This study is supported by Fondo Nacional para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FONCyT, Argentina) (PICT 2011-2520, PICT 2014-1818, PICT 2015-2036).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two of the more interesting and controversial platyrrhine primate taxa from the Miocene of Patagonia are Soriacebus and Mazzonicebus. Although they are known basically from isolated teeth and partial mandibles and maxillae, their morphology is highly distinctive. Opinions about their phylogenetic relationships differ widely. We interpret these fossils as belonging to the lineage of the anatomically derived, living pitheciine seed-predators; others hold the view that they are stem platyrrhines with convergent adaptations with pitheciines (with the single exception of Proteropithecia among the Patagonian forms), somewhat distant relatives converging coincidently with pitheciines. Here we tested these hypotheses in two ways: (1) by summarizing a character analysis of taxonomically informative traits; (2) we implemented "blind" parsimony analyses using the software package TNT, including a combined matrix of both morphological and molecular data, and replication studies of other matrices. We make some criticisms on the applied methodology of Parsimony in our analysis. Soriacebus and Mazzonicebus resulted sister-taxa nested deeply within the pitheciid clade; thus, and according to our inferences, they are not stem platyrrhines. Most of the differences separating them from the younger and uniformly recognized pitheciine fossils Proteropithecia, Nuciruptor and Cebupithecia are explained as being of more primitive character states; the vast majority of resemblances and their broader functional patterns are definitively pitheciine, as typified by the living pitheciines (sakis and uakaris). We therefore found that none of the Miocene Patagonian genera treated here can be reliably interpreted as stem platyrrhines. Rather, they tend to ratify the Long Lineage Hypothesis.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFossilsPhylogenyPitheciidaeAnimalsArgentinaToothMioceneparsimonyPatagoniaphylogenyPitheciinaePlatyrrhini

Identifiers

PMID40375807
PMCPMC12082270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.