SynthesisInternational journal of dermatology2025
Dupilumab for the Treatment of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dupilumab for Treatment-refractory Bullous Pemphigoid: A Case Series of Six Patients.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Pembrolizumab-induced oral erosive lichen planus treated with dupilumab.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Severe cutaneous adverse reactions linked to medications in children and adolescents: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Dupilumab Can Be Effective for Immune-Related Adverse Event Dermatitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- The Use of Morphology-Directed Targeted Immunosuppression With Dupilumab in Cutaneous Immunotherapy Related Adverse Events.International journal of dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment in the modern era. However, cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are common, significantly affecting patients' quality of life and often leading to treatment discontinuation, which may compromise oncological outcomes. Dupilumab, an immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 receptors, is widely used for dermatologic conditions but remains unapproved for cirAEs due to the limited and scattered supporting evidence. This review aimed to summarize the available evidence regarding the use of dupilumab for the management of cirAEs. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In total, 25 publications met the eligibility criteria and were included, reporting 136 patients who were diagnosed with 140 cirAEs and were treated with dupilumab. The most frequently treated cirAEs were eczematous rashes, bullous pemphigoid, and maculopapular/morbilliform rashes. Dupilumab was found to be highly effective, with most patients achieving complete or partial responses, even when affected by two concomitant cirAEs. An acceptable safety profile was demonstrated regarding both adverse events and oncological safety, with no additional concerns to be raised. The findings may be encouraging but are limited by the relatively small number of patients treated and the nature of the included studies, with most of them being case reports and case series. More research is warranted, along with more clinical studies, prospective in design, focused on relevant clinical outcomes of this dupilumab-treated subset of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.