ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Multiprofessional Family Care for Women With Gynaecological Cancer.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to determine how family care is implemented in the care of women with gynaecological cancer from the perspective of health professionals in Finland.
designMultiphase convergent mixed-methods research.
methodsThis study is based on two datasets collected from one Finnish university hospital. The first dataset was collected from health professionals (n = 20) in one Finnish university hospital inpatient unit in 2023. The second dataset is based on non-participant observational cases (n = 137) of health professionals in the spring of 2024. The quantitative data were analysed using both parametric and non-parametric tests. The qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsThe quantitative results of the first and second phases together confirm the gap between the lack of competence and the attitudes of health professionals towards their own communication skills. The qualitative results revealed two main themes: (1) increasing competence towards a more comprehensive patient care process and (2) increasing the sense of safety by sharing timely information between professionals, patients, and relatives.
conclusionFamily-oriented working and communication between professionals is incidental and individual-dependent. Increased competence and more effective sharing and exchange of care information between professionals can improve the quality of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The study was able to identify important areas of family care for professionals to improve their clinical practice. IMPACT: This study addressed clinical competence, as demonstrated by the family care perspective. Family care is recognised as an important part of the care of gynaecological cancer patients and requires increased competence. This study aims to raise awareness among health professionals and policymakers about the current state of family care in Finland. REPORTING
methodThis study was prepared and reported according to the STROBE checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.