ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Age-Related Differences in Neural Correlates of Auditory Spatial Change Detection in Real and Virtual Environments.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective spatial attention to competing speakers in azimuth and depth: Evidence from real and virtual environments.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Concurrent Assessment of Sequential Auditory Event-Related Potentials Using an Optimized Paired-Stimulus Local-Global Paradigm.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Change detection in audio-visual space: neural evidence for age effects.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Studying dynamic sound source localization in a virtual maze with EEG and psychophysics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Event-Related Potentials as Markers of Age-Related Changes of Spatial Hearing in Normal-Hearing Adults.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although virtual environments are increasingly used in research, their ecological validity in simulating real-life scenarios, for example, to investigate cognitive changes in aging populations, remains relatively unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the validity of a virtual environment for investigating auditory spatial change detection in younger and older adults. This evaluation was performed by comparing behavioral and neurophysiological responses between real and virtual environments. Participants completed an auditory change detection task, identifying sound source position changes relative to a reference position. In the real environment, sounds were presented through physical loudspeakers in a reverberant room. In the virtual environment, stimuli were delivered through headphones, accompanied by a head-mounted display showing a visual replica of the room. Participants showed higher accuracy for azimuth than for distance changes, regardless of age or environment, emphasizing humans' larger sensitivity to lateralized sounds. Event-related potentials were mostly consistent across environments, with significantly higher N1 and P2 amplitudes in older compared with younger adults. Mismatch negativity was reduced in older adults, and both reduced and delayed in the virtual environment. The P3b showed larger amplitudes and shorter latencies for azimuth changes, reflecting greater salience of directional cues, whereas responses in the virtual environment were slightly diminished, especially among older adults. Bayesian analyses validated the observed effects. Results support virtual environments as reliable tools for exploring spatial perception and underlying neural and behavioral processes in realistic contexts. Furthermore, differences in the processing of spatial changes in azimuth and distance, as well as age-related effects, could be highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.