ArticleReproductive health2025
Readiness of health facilities to deliver family planning services and associated factors in urban east-central Uganda.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- When policy meets practice: enacting WHO global standards for adolescent reproductive health services in Uganda.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Social influence on women's contraceptive use: Population-based, sociocentric network study in rural Uganda.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
- Free but declining: the paradox of contraceptive uptake in Burkina Faso.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- What drives inequality in modern family planning use among urban women residents? A cross-sectional analysis using the inequality of opportunity framework in Uganda's secondary cities.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Structural quality of health facilities to provide family planning services in Ethiopia: Evidence from the 2021-22 Ethiopia Service Provision Assessment survey.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth facility readiness is essential for realizing voluntary, rights-based family planning. However, many countries, including rapidly urbanizing Uganda, face challenges in ensuring their health facilities are sufficiently equipped to meet the growing demand for these services. This study assessed readiness and associated factors across public, private-not-for-profit (PNFP), and private-for-profit (PFP) health facilities in urban east-central Uganda to guide strategies for improving service delivery.
methodsThe study used secondary data from a cross-sectional study done in Jinja City and Iganga Municipality, including a health facility assessment and health worker survey. Readiness was measured using the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment methodology, and health worker knowledge and biases were assessed through the Situation Analysis approach. Sample weights adjusted for facility and health worker representation, and linear regression examined associations between readiness scores and various factors.
resultsAmong 152 health facilities, 94.2% offered family planning services, with an average readiness score of 46.7% (standard deviation ± 17.0). Short-acting methods had high availability (99.0%), while long-acting reversible contraceptives (34.2%) and permanent options (8.9%) were less available, compounded by prevalent stock-outs. Additionally, staff refresher training was inadequate, particularly in PFP facilities (50.4%), and health worker knowledge, confidence and willingness to provide some methods, particularly long-acting options and natural family planning counselling, were low. Notably, out of 261 health workers, 97.7% imposed at least one restriction to service access based on either age, parity, marital status, or spousal consent, more pronounced in PNFP facilities. Readiness was significantly associated with facility level (health centre level II facilities: β = -9.42, p = 0.036; drug shops: β = -11.00, p = 0.022), external supervision (β = 9.04, p = 0.009), holding administrative meetings (β = 9.72, p = 0.017), and imposing marital status (β = -9.42, p = 0.017) and spousal consent access barriers (β = 6.24, p = 0.023).
conclusionsThis study found sub-optimal facility readiness, highlighting the need to strengthen governance of services across both public and private sectors, implement comprehensive training for health workers in both sectors, and align policies to ensure equitable access to a full range of services for all clients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.