ArticleDiagnostic pathology2025
A case report: iridociliary melanocytoma associated with secondary glaucoma.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistinguishing between benign iridociliary melanocytoma and malignant melanoma presents a diagnostic challenge, particularly given the potential overlap in tumor growth patterns and clinical manifestations, especially when patients present with secondary glaucoma. Misdiagnosis may induce severe clinical consequences, including enucleation. Therefore, the judicious selection of biopsy or surgical techniques is crucial in both diagnosing and managing the condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old female presented with uncontrolled elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and a heavily pigmented iris lesion extending into the anterior chamber angle and adjacent ciliary body. Unexpectedly, standardized initial fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) yielded inconclusive results. Subsequent excisional surgery (partial iridocyclectomy and concurrent phacoemulsification) was performed to remove the tumor mass and treat cataract. Histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis as melanocytoma. Lens implantation followed upon normalization of IOP within 8 months. At the 2-year follow-up, the patient exhibited a satisfactory clinical outcome, with no tumor recurrence, achieving a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 and an intraocular pressure of 18.5 mmHg.
conclusionsThis case underscores the importance of obtaining adequate tumor specimens for accurate diagnosis via FNAB in iris and ciliary body tumors. Additionally, for patients with secondary glaucoma, partial iridocyclectomy emerges as a promising intervention, addressing anterior chamber angle obstruction to alleviate IOP while facilitating histopathological diagnosis for subsequent management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.