Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375259›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Bullying in medicine: a cross-sectional study among intern doctors in Sri Lanka.

Manudi Vidanapathirana, Deshan Gomez, Saroj Jayasinghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manudi VidanapathiranaNational Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka. manudi.vidanapathirana@gmail.com.
Deshan GomezNational Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Saroj JayasingheFaculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBullying in medicine is common and has harmful effects on the victimized professionals, their patients and the healthcare system. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of workplace bullying among intern doctors in Sri Lanka and examine its associated factors.

methodsThis was conducted as a descriptive cross-sectional study among intern doctors who had completed at least 6 months of internship. A self-administered questionnaire which incorporated the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised was used for data collection. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 26 and associations were analyzed using Chi Square.

resultsThe response rate was 78.2% (n = 208). The results revealed that 76.9% of intern doctors experienced workplace bullying. All forms of workplace bullying were commonly reported by participants: work-related bullying was experienced in the form of having one's opinions ignored (56.7%, n = 118),) being ordered to do work below one's level of competence (55.3%, n = 115) and being exposed to unmanageable workload (50%, n = 104); person-related bullying was experienced in the form of being ridiculed in connection with one's work (55.8%) and persistent criticism of errors (52.4%). Almost half (48.1%, n = 100) had been subjected to hints or signals that they should quit their job. Physical intimidation was experienced by 61.1% (n = 127) and 18.3% (n = 38) reported threats of physical abuse or actual abuse. Interns that frequently felt that the assigned work was above their capacity(p < 0.001) and ethnicity (p < 0.01) were found to be significantly associated with bullying.

conclusionsBullying is commonly experienced by Sri Lankan intern doctors with many being subjected to physical intimidation. Rigorous steps should be taken to address workplace bullying to facilitate supportive work environments.

Indexed as

BullyingInternship and ResidencyPhysiciansAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSri LankaSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID40375259
PMCPMC12079839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.