ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Assessing implant position and bone properties after cementless total knee arthroplasty using weight-bearing computed tomography.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Review
- Weight-bearing computed tomography in knee pathologies: current evidence and future perspectives.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of weight-bearing cone beam CT arthrography and supine 3T MRI in knee osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWeight-bearing CT (WBCT) scanners are growing in availability and provide the capability of three-dimensional imaging while a joint is under load. This may be particularly useful in relation to personalized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cementless implants. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the utility and inter-observer repeatability of WBCT in assessing patients with cementless TKA in a loaded position.
methodsForty patients who underwent primary TKA approximately 3 years previously and received one of two cementless implant systems were recruited, including two subjects with bilateral TKA, for a total of 42 knees. All subjects underwent examination of their knee with WBCT while standing, thereby loading the indicated knee. Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), and joint line obliquity (JLO) were measured on full length radiographs and the WBCT exams by two observers. Femoral and tibial component rotation was measured on WBCT. Greyscale values representing bone density were assessed in five identically sized regions of interests in both the femur and the tibia on WBCT.
resultsInter-observer agreement for alignment was good (95% ICC: 0.87). Inter-observer agreement for femoral component rotation was moderate (95% ICC: 0.67) and for tibial component rotation was good (95% ICC: 0.84). Inter-observer agreement for femoral greyscale values was good (95% ICC: 0.87) and for tibial greyscale values was excellent (95% ICC: 0.97).
conclusionCementless TKA can be assessed postoperatively using WBCT to measure implant position and bone density in a functional, loaded joint position with good inter-observer repeatability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.