ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
The transfusion of prematures early school age follow-up (TOP 5): protocol for a longitudinal cohort study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01702805 (Transfusion of Prematures), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Transfusion of Prematures (TOP) Trial: Does a Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy Improve Neurologically-Intact Survival of Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Infants as Compared to a Restrictive Strategy?
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- School-age neurodevelopmental outcomes after non-emergency red blood cell transfusions in preterm infants: a propensity score-matched study from the Epipage 2 cohort.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnemia of prematurity is a common concern for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) patients in the neonatal intensive care unit. The hemoglobin threshold at which the benefits of red blood cell transfusion outweigh the risks is unknown. The NICHD Neonatal Research Network Transfusion of Prematures (TOP) Trial evaluated whether higher (more liberal) hemoglobin transfusion thresholds resulted in improved survival without neurodevelopmental impairment at 22-26 months' corrected age. A total of 1824 ELBW infants born at 22-28 weeks' gestation were enrolled in the trial and randomized to either a restrictive or liberal set of red blood cell transfusion thresholds. Longer-term impacts of different transfusion thresholds in treatment for anemia of prematurity remain unknown. The Transfusion of Prematures Early School Age Follow-up (TOP 5) Study extends follow-up of all surviving children enrolled in the TOP Trial until early school age. It aims to assess longer-term cognitive and functional effects of differing transfusion thresholds in the newborn period for anemia in this large, multicenter cohort.
methodsParents of surviving trial participants complete telephone questionnaires when their children are 3 and 4 years' corrected age. A single in-person study visit takes place at early school age (5 years, 0 months to 7 years, 11 months' corrected age). Children undergo a multidimensional assessment of functional outcomes, and parents complete a battery of questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The TOP 5 Study will be the largest and most comprehensive evaluation to date of the functional early school age outcomes of children managed with different red blood cell transfusion thresholds during infancy for treatment of anemia of prematurity. This will substantially improve understanding of the longer-term neurological and functional outcomes of different transfusion thresholds; provide more refined evaluation of cognition, executive function, school readiness, motor skills, adaptive functioning, and behavior in former extremely preterm infants; and inform future clinical decision-making for treating anemia of prematurity.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT01702805. Primary trial registration 10/05/2012; modified to include follow-up through school age 12/20/2018. This manuscript reflects version 3 of the trial protocol, dated 12/07/2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.