Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Clinical outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment using C-root SP combined with different obturation techniques in older patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of continuous wave of condensation on postoperative pain using bioceramic versus resin sealers: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Assessing Sealing Ability of C-Root SP Strontium Silicate Sealer With Different Obturation Techniques: An in vitro Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of C-Root SP bioceramic-based sealers combined with different obturation techniques in nonsurgical root canal treatment for older patients.
methodsThis prospective, single-center, single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial included 240 patients aged ≥ 60 years. Patients were randomly divided into four treatment groups. Group A: C-Root SP combined with single-cone (SC); Group B: C-Root SP combined with warm vertical compaction (WVC); Group C: C-Root SP combined with cold lateral condensation (CLC); Group D: iRoot SP combined with SC (Control). All teeth were subjected to root canal filling using the corresponding methods 7-10 days after root canal preparation and medication. The duration of obturation was recorded. Periapical radiographs were obtained immediately after obturation to determine the length of root canal filling, and postoperative pain on days 1, 2, and 7 was documented. The treatment outcomes based on clinical signs and symptoms as well as periapical index (PAI) were analyzed at 1 year postoperatively.
resultsGroups A and D exhibited significantly higher filling efficiency than groups B and C (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the length of obturation between the groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative pain decreased over time in all groups, with group A showing significantly lower pain rates on day 1 than the other groups (P < 0.05). After 1 year, all groups exhibited considerable reductions in the PAI scores, with success rates ranging from 91.23 to 94.83%; however, no significant differences were observed between them (P > 0.05).
conclusionsC-Root SP combined with different obturation techniques yielded similar outcomes to iRoot SP combined with the SC technique in terms of filling length, success rate, and changes in PAI scores. The SC technique demonstrated significant advantages in terms of clinical efficiency and may reduce early postoperative pain when combined with C-Root SP.
trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered in chictr.org.cn with the identifier: ChiCTR2400092580 on 11/19/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.