ArticleBMC public health2025
24-hour movement behaviours and health outcomes among forcibly displaced children affected by conflict or natural disasters: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental Factors Associated With Preschoolers' Outdoor Play and Napping in Childcare Settings: The SUNRISE International Study.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
- Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Mental Health in University Students: A Compositional Isotemporal Substitution Analysis.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile there is growing evidence on 24-hour movement behaviours (physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep) in non-displacement settings, understanding these behaviours among displaced children remains limited. This scoping review explored evidence on 24-hour movement behaviours, including active play and health among forcibly displaced children (birth to 12 years) affected by conflict or natural disasters.
methodsWe followed JBI guidelines and PRISMA extensions for scoping reviews. Seven databases (PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ProQuest) were searched for peer-reviewed studies published in English between January 2000 and July 2024. We used the Population, Concept and Context framework to set eligibility criteria based on our research questions. Two independent reviewers screened the records, and the first author extracted the data, which was then double-checked by a co-author. Data were analysed using narrative synthesis.
resultsA total of 28 articles met the inclusion criteria, all of which relied on parent- or self-reports. Forcibly displaced children generally had low levels of physical activity, high sedentary behaviour, including excessive screen time, and disrupted sleep. Girls were less active than boys. An increased risk of obesity and developmental delays were found to be prevalent among forcibly displaced children. Disaster-related stress negatively associated with muscular strength, whereas child-friendly spaces, structured activities, and physical education enhanced the resilience and well-being of displaced children. However, a limited number of child-friendly play spaces were observed in displacement settings.
conclusionsThis scoping review highlights the urgent need to promote healthy levels of 24-hour movement behaviours and recognise the right to play among forcibly displaced children, considering limited active play spaces in such settings. Future research should prioritise mixed methods, including device-based measures, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, to gain better insights and inform humanitarian responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.