ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Role of liver transient elastography in detecting cirrhosis with esophageal and gastric varices and evaluating variceal severity.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the application and clinical value of liver transient elastography (TE) in diagnosing and assessing the degree of liver cirrhosis combined with esophageal and gastric varices (EGV).
methodsWe chose 136 patients with cirrhosis and EGV admitted to the Liver Disease Department of our hospital from December 2022 to December 2024. The patients were divided into mild EGV (n = 71), moderate EGV (n = 40), and severe EGV (n = 25) based on the gastroscopic results, and another 50 cases of healthy physical examination at the same period were admitted into the control group. All cases underwent liver TE, biochemical parameters, and immune parameters examination to observe the diagnostic efficacy of liver TE in cirrhosis combined with EGV and the degree of varices.
resultsThe differences in TBIL, ALT, AST, PTA, and other biochemical parameters between all of groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The differences were not statistically significant for the four groups of IgM, IgG, and other immune indices (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood flow among these groups (P > 0.05). The interior diameter (ID) of the portal vein, blood flow velocity, and liver stiffness values were significant (P < 0.05). Portal vein ID, blood velocity, and liver stiffness values showed well diagnostic efficacy in cirrhosis with EGV, and liver stiffness values were the best in evaluating cirrhosis with EGV (P < 0.05). Liver stiffness values were more effective in assessing the degree of varices in cirrhosis combined with EGV and the best in diagnosing cirrhosis combined with severe EGV (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe application of liver TE has a high value in diagnosing cirrhosis combined with EGV and their degree of varices, especially in identifying severe curves, which has good clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.