ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
PEPsy-CM study protocol: impact of a 3-year program for early psychosis based on case-management on relapse rate, a French multicenter randomized trial.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05116514 (Evaluation of the Impact of Case Manager Intervention on the 3-year Psychotic Episode Recurrence Rate in Patients Aged 16 to 30 Years With a First Psychotic Episode. Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Controlled Study With Blinded Evaluation.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Impact of Case Manager Intervention on the 3-year Psychotic Episode Recurrence Rate in Patients Aged 16 to 30 Years With a First Psychotic Episode. Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Controlled Study With Blinded Evaluation.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly intervention services (EIS) for early psychosis can help reduce the patient-specific and economic impacts of mental illness, but they are underdeveloped and practices are poorly harmonized in many countries.
methodsThe aim of the study is to evaluate in France the effectiveness of a three-year Program for Early Psychosis based on Case Management (PEPsy-CM) compared to TAU in young people with a first episode of psychosis (FEP). Eligible participants are those aged between 16 and 30 years old consulting or hospitalized in mental health services for a FEP. Exclusion criteria include mental retardation, psychosis due to medication or medical condition. Four centers have so far joined the study and started recruiting. In this randomized controlled trial, the interventional group will receive TAU with the addition of intensive follow-up by a case manager, in accordance with EPPIC guidelines. The primary outcome is the percentage of participants relapsing at least once during the three-year follow-up, and time until first relapse. Secondary outcomes are relapse and hospitalization rate, adherence to care, clinical outcomes (psychotic et depressive symptoms, suicidal and aggressive behaviors, substance use), functional outcomes (living conditions, level of study or employment, social and occupational functioning), quality of life (patients and caregivers), users' satisfaction, direct and indirect costs and correct implementation of the intervention. DISCUSSION: The results from this study will be invaluable in characterizing the role of early intervention and case management, and establishing optimal care protocols to treat early psychosis in France. The study has encountered problems in attracting recruiting centers often to commit to randomization. The medico-economic evaluation is a strength of the study, as economic objectives are too infrequently considered in such studies.
trial registrationwww. CLINICALTRIALS: gov number NCT05116514 registered on 05/10/2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.