ReviewBMC neurology2025
Pineal cyst apoplexy in a pregnant female: case report and review of literature.
Review in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPineal cyst is an uncommon condition in pregnancy. It is often encountered as an incidental finding. Most pineal cysts are benign and asymptomatic. Bleeding inside these cysts is rarely encountered in pregnancy. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old female patient with no significant past medical history, presented to the emergency department at 36 weeks gestation with a transient episode of unilateral headache. Headache was associated with dizziness and left arm ascending numbness. She has a history of a known pineal cyst. The neurological examination was normal. INVESTIGATIONS: CT head was obtained, reviewed and compared to previous scans 7 years ago. It showed a hemorrhage inside the pineal cyst . MANAGEMENT: The patient was admitted to the neurosurgery department for conservative management and a few days later, symptoms gradually improved. FOLLOW-UP: Three weeks later, the patient reported spontaneous improvement of the presenting symptoms. The decision was to proceed with continued watchful follow-up and awaiting a caesarian delivery. The patient returned for a follow-up three months later without any symptoms. Following delivery, the patient remained asymptomatic.
conclusionPineal cyst apoplexy is a relatively rare condition and it usually affects young females, however, the exact relation to pregnancy and the effect of apoplexy on the course of pregnancy are not well defined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.