SynthesisBMC primary care2025
Brief interventions for suicidal ideation in primary care: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PACIC: patient activation and problem solving not related to age in patients with depressive symptoms.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- A retrospective cohort study of clinical characteristics and healthcare contacts in Sweden prior to suicide in individuals with heart disease.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Suicide risk assessment: clinical implications of the unpredictability of suicidal behavior.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Suicide prevention in primary health care among socially vulnerable populations: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in assessing and diagnosing suicidal ideation, often acting as the first person of contact for individuals with mental health concerns. Given the time constraints faced by primary care providers, interventions need to be brief and easily implemented. This systematic review seeks to identify, compare, and critically evaluate effective brief interventions for managing suicidality in primary care, offering a comprehensive overview and discussion of key findings.
methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PSYNDEX, and PsychINFO, supplemented by manual searches. Our search strategy focused on studies from 2000 to 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 Tool, and evidence quality was evaluated using GRADE, with adherence to the PRISMA-DTA checklist. A protocol was published in PROSPERO.
resultsThe search yielded 1248 publications. Of those, 44 were assessed for eligibility after screening, ultimately resulting in five included studies addressing four brief interventions for suicidality in primary care. Motivational interviews, safety planning, structured follow-ups, and collaborative care models were identified as key elements for future interventions to enhance the role of primary care in suicide prevention.
conclusionThis review highlights the need for further research to adapt brief interventions for primary care suicide prevention. Given their central role in patient care, GPs are well-positioned to identify and support individuals at risk. While initial promising approaches have emerged, further research in primary care suicide prevention is needed, and interventions tailored to the GP setting must be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.