ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Understanding and integrating the needs and preferences of people living with dementia in the inpatient setting: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with dementia (PLWD) have poorer outcomes than cognitively normal people when admitted to hospital. One reason for this difference is related to the challenges in learning and integrating the needs and preferences of PLWD into clinical care. We aimed to obtain a range of perspectives on the challenges in supporting PLWD in hospital and explore opportunities for improvement.
methodsUsing an exploratory qualitative study design, we conducted interviews with nine people supporting PLWD (current / ex-spouses or children of PLWD) and 11 nursing, medical and allied health staff members at a single Australian hospital. Data were thematically analysed using a framework approach.
resultsParticipants described how best practice in supporting PLWD included understanding and integrating patient needs and highlighted the importance of family and the multidisciplinary team working in partnership. A number of factors inhibiting quality care provision were described, including uncertainty around responsibility for communicating with families to understand needs of PLWD; unsuitable tools; lack of opportunities for families to communicate with staff; and, resource and environmental constraints. Participants discussed potential for improvement, emphasising the need for a pre-emptive, rather than reactive solution. They expressed support for the idea of a 'hospital admission kit', containing both information about PLWD and their familiar items. Implementation considerations were also noted, with various perspectives on the timing of initiation, updating, responsible person(s), format, content and how it should be incorporated into clinical workflows.
conclusionsWe found that hospital staff and those supporting PLWD felt that integrating the needs and preferences of PLWD into hospital care was important. The concept of a pre-prepared 'toolkit' that was ready in the case of a need to attend hospital was felt to be valid and potentially helpful. More work is required to design aspects such as format, content and the workflows needed to generate accountability and reliability in creating, updating and incorporating it into hospital care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.