ArticleBMC oral health2025
Comparison of the distribution of the dental hygienist workforce and population in Ontario: a geospatial analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study conducted a geospatial analysis of the distribution of the dental hygienist workforce relative to the distribution of the population in Ontario, Canada, aiming to address workforce imbalances and inform regional and international workforce planning.
methodsGeospatial analysis techniques were employed to examine the dental hygienist workforce distribution using anonymized datasets from the College of Dental Hygienists of Ontario (the professional regulatory body) and the Canadian census. The data were linked using the forward sortation area (FSA) component of Canadian postal codes, covering 520 FSAs across Ontario. Analyses were conducted at three levels, based on different aggregations of postal code data.
resultsThe study found significant variations in the distribution of dental hygienists across Ontario. The analysis revealed pockets of high dental hygienist density, mostly in urban areas, and areas with low dental hygienist rates, especially in rural and remote locations. The overall provincial rate was 97 dental hygienists per 100,000 population, with variation across the 520 FSAs, from zero to 20,000 dental hygienists per 100,000 population (or zero to 739 dental hygienists per 100,000 population if five outlier FSAs were removed).
conclusionsThe study underscores the complexity of dental hygienist workforce distribution in Ontario, revealing significant geographical disparities that suggest areas of both oversupply and undersupply. These insights provide actionable guidance for workforce policies and regulatory strategies, such as targeted incentives and public health initiatives, to address the mismatch between workforce supply and population needs. The findings highlight the importance of regular geospatial analyses to track changes in workforce distribution over time. The rigorous methodological approach and comprehensive evaluation of potential limitations offer valuable guidance for similar analyses in other jurisdictions. By providing a detailed framework and insights that extend beyond Ontario, this study contributes to the global understanding of dental hygienist workforce dynamics and supports the development of informed policies on a broader scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.