Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375094›Full record

Trial reportThe International journal of eating disorders2025

Acceptability and Efficacy of a Web-Based, Intuitive Eating-Focused Single Session Intervention for Recurrent Binge Eating: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mariel Messer, Claudia Liu, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Cleo Anderson, Tracy L Tylka, Jake Linardon

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariel MesserSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7186-7264
Claudia LiuSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1359-2394
Matthew Fuller-TyszkiewiczSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1145-6057
Cleo AndersonSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1203-5492
Tracy L TylkaDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-1309
Jake LinardonSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4475-7139

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant APP1196948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntuitive eating is a viable intervention target for binge eating, yet current programs designed to cultivate this pattern of eating face challenges with scalability and accessibility. We developed a web-based, intuitive eating-focused, single-session intervention (SSI) and evaluated its acceptability and efficacy among individuals with recurrent binge eating.

methodTwo-hundred-forty-eight participants reporting recurrent binge eating were randomly assigned to the SSI or a waitlist. Study assessments were conducted at baseline, 2-week post-test, and 6-week follow-up. Analyses were performed under the intention-to-treat principle.

resultsEvidence of acceptability was observed among study retainers, with good ratings of perceived usefulness and satisfaction, and two in three stating that they would recommend the program. Issues with attrition were apparent across both groups. The intervention group reported significantly greater pre-post improvements than the control group in intuitive eating, symptoms of eating disorders, body appreciation, and body interoception, with moderate to large effect sizes. Improvements in intervention participants persisted at 6 weeks and were largely stable across sensitivity analyses that handled missing data in different ways, with a few exceptions. Between 30% and 60% of intervention participants reported that the SSI had increased indicators of confidence and motivation to change, and receptivity towards further help options.

conclusionThis study highlights the acceptability and potential efficacy of brief, but concentrated interventions designed to foster intuitive eating for binge eating. Findings add to a growing body of literature highlighting the potential benefits of SSIs for symptoms of eating disorders.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderBulimiaInternet-Based InterventionIntuitionPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultBody ImageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultbinge eatingeating disorderrandomized controlled trialsingle session intervention

Identifiers

PMID40375094
PMCPMC12336771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.