Trial reportThe International journal of eating disorders2025
Acceptability and Efficacy of a Web-Based, Intuitive Eating-Focused Single Session Intervention for Recurrent Binge Eating: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability and Efficacy of a Web-Based, Intuitive Eating-Focused Single Session Intervention for Recurrent Binge Eating: A Randomized Controlled Trial.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Trial
- The effects of waiting time for outpatient psychotherapeutic interventions on patient-reported outcomes in adolescents and adults with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Review
- Defining the guiding principles of weight-inclusive nutrition education.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Intuitive Eating Intervention in Physically Active Adults: Effects on Anthropometry, Athletic Performance, Eating Attitudes, and Body Image.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIntuitive eating is a viable intervention target for binge eating, yet current programs designed to cultivate this pattern of eating face challenges with scalability and accessibility. We developed a web-based, intuitive eating-focused, single-session intervention (SSI) and evaluated its acceptability and efficacy among individuals with recurrent binge eating.
methodTwo-hundred-forty-eight participants reporting recurrent binge eating were randomly assigned to the SSI or a waitlist. Study assessments were conducted at baseline, 2-week post-test, and 6-week follow-up. Analyses were performed under the intention-to-treat principle.
resultsEvidence of acceptability was observed among study retainers, with good ratings of perceived usefulness and satisfaction, and two in three stating that they would recommend the program. Issues with attrition were apparent across both groups. The intervention group reported significantly greater pre-post improvements than the control group in intuitive eating, symptoms of eating disorders, body appreciation, and body interoception, with moderate to large effect sizes. Improvements in intervention participants persisted at 6 weeks and were largely stable across sensitivity analyses that handled missing data in different ways, with a few exceptions. Between 30% and 60% of intervention participants reported that the SSI had increased indicators of confidence and motivation to change, and receptivity towards further help options.
conclusionThis study highlights the acceptability and potential efficacy of brief, but concentrated interventions designed to foster intuitive eating for binge eating. Findings add to a growing body of literature highlighting the potential benefits of SSIs for symptoms of eating disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.