ArticleBMC health services research2025
Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for implementing obstetric life support in diverse healthcare contexts throughout Arizona: a mixed methods protocol.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost medical responders are not adequately trained to recognize and treat maternal medical emergencies, including maternal cardiac arrest, and national credentialing standards do not exist. Obstetric Life Support (OBLS) is a validated simulation-based curriculum designed to equip prehospital and hospital-based healthcare workers (HCWs) with the knowledge and skills necessary to prevent, recognize, and manage maternal medical emergencies. Widespread implementation of OBLS could enhance patient safety and reduce disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. However, research is needed to develop strategies that ensure sustained and equitable access for HCWs across diverse healthcare settings. This paper presents a protocol for evaluating a train-the-trainer approach to implement OBLS in hospitals, freestanding birthing centers, and prehospital contexts across Arizona.
methodsThis multisite, mixed-methods study is being conducted in collaboration with the Arizona Perinatal Trust, a regional perinatal health system that encompasses 38 in-hospital birthing centers and Level I-IV hospitals across Arizona, and the Arizona Emergency Medical Systems LLC, which coordinates 85 emergency medical services agencies statewide. A Steering Committee comprising local, regional, and national stakeholders provides guidance and oversight for all study activities. To promote rapid learning, two consecutive OBLS implementation and evaluation cycles will be conducted, with the second cycle incorporating feedback and lessons learned from the first. HCWs from 16 implementation sites (8 per cycle) serving areas with high maternal vulnerability indexes will be trained as OBLS instructors. These instructors will train at least 160 HCWs (80 per cycle) within their respective or nearby institutions. Outcomes to be assessed include reach (proportion and representation of institutions offering OBLS, instructors trained, and HCWs participating), effectiveness (impact of OBLS on knowledge and clinical competencies, presence of code carts containing OBLS cognitive aids and resuscitative cesarean delivery kits in hospitals, and the use of an OB Arrest Alert in prehospital settings), adoption (allocation of resources for OBLS), implementation (number of courses completed, fidelity of the training delivery), and maintenance (extent to which training becomes integrated into routine practice and policy). DISCUSSION: Findings from this statewide study will be used to promote the scale-up and sustainability of OBLS, ultimately enhancing maternal healthcare quality and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.