Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40375040›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Workplace equity in radiology: a nationwide survey by the Radiological Society of Finland.

Suvi Marjasuo, Milja Holstila, Jussi Hirvonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suvi MarjasuoRadiology, University of Helsinki and HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. suvi.marjasuo@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-6634
Milja HolstilaDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jussi HirvonenDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe issue of equity among medical professionals has been extensively discussed in recent literature. Gender inequity, in particular, is a well-documented phenomenon within scientific communities. The Radiological Society of Finland undertook a national survey to assess equity among radiologists in Finland, with the primary hypothesis of equity prevailing in the radiological community.

methodsA cross-sectional study in the form of an online questionnaire was developed to investigate occupational equity and demographic variables. This survey was disseminated to the heads of radiological departments in all Finnish public healthcare units and the largest radiological units within the private sector, with instructions to distribute to their medical staff. The questionnaire was accessible for responses from May 1 to June 16, 2024.

resultsA total of 259 answers were received, representing 31% of all radiologists and residents working in Finland. Among the respondents, 137/259 (52.9%) identified as female, 118/259 (45.6%) male, and 1/259 (0.4%) other, with three choosing not to answer. A significant proportion, 63/259 (24.3%), reported having witnessed discriminatory behavior, while 41/259 (15.8%) had personally experienced discrimination. The prevalence of respondents having witnessed workplace discrimination was notably higher in female respondents (42/131, 32.1%) than in males (18/113, 15.9%) or others (0%) (p = 0.012). The most cited bases for discrimination included gender, opinion, age, and cultural background.

conclusionsPerceived discrimination is prevalent within the Finnish radiological community. Gender was reported as the most common suspected grounds of perceived discriminatory behavior. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study is the first to explore equity and diversity among radiologists in Finland. This broader approach offers a more comprehensive perspective, and the findings aim to support efforts toward greater inclusivity and equity within the field. KEY POINTS: One-quarter of radiologists in Finland reported witnessing and one-sixth reported personally experiencing discrimination in the workplace. Gender was suspected to be the most common basis for discrimination, followed by differences in opinion, age, and cultural background. Respondents were largely unaware of whether the reported incidents had been addressed. Increasing transparency and communication may help reduce perceived discrimination.

Indexed as

DiversityEquityOccupational wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40375040
PMCPMC12081815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.