Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374951›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effects of different anesthetic drugs on electroretinography in mice.

Chaofeng Yu, Xue Wang, Kunhuan Yang, Yun Han, Shiying Li, Yi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Measuring electroretinograms in tree shrews with a portable electrophysiology device.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chaofeng YuAier Academy of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, China.
Xue WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230061, China.
Kunhuan YangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
Yun HanFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
Shiying LiFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China. shiying_li@126.com.
Yi WangAier Academy of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, China. wangyieye@aliyun.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81974138Natural Basic Research Program of China 2018YFA0107301Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province 2020SKC2003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrophysiology (ERG) is widely used for retinal function assessment, but the effects of different anesthetics on ERG recordings, particularly in degenerated retinas, remain unclear. This study investigated the effects of different anesthetic drugs on ERG in wild-type (WT), Kv8.2 knockout (KO), and rd10 mice. Anesthetic drugs, avertin (300 mg/kg) and pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally, isoflurane was given at 5% for induction and 1.5% for maintenance. Full-field flash electroretinography (ff-ERG) was recorded, including scotopic and photopic responses. Specifically, the amplitudes of a-wave, b-wave, oscillatory potentials (OPs), photopic negative response (PhNR), and c-wave were analyzed, respectively. Additionally, fundus imaging and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed to analyze retinal morphology. The three anesthetics had no obvious effect on retinal morphology. Pentobarbital sodium decreased scotopic OPs, increased scotopic and photopic b-wave amplitudes and decreased photopic a-wave amplitude in all groups of mice. Isoflurane resulted in larger scotopic OPs and photopic a-wave amplitudes in all groups, with a larger scotopic a-wave amplitude in KO mice. The PhNR amplitude was greater in WT mice anesthetized with avertin. The ERG amplitudes in mice showed significant differences among the three anesthetic conditions. Pentobarbital sodium markedly suppressed retinal OPs, suggesting it may not be suitable for assessing inner retinal function, particularly amacrine cells. Isoflurane enabled excellent recordings of various types of ERG, making it suitable for nearly all ERG recordings. Avertin might serve as a suitable alternative in the absence of isoflurane.

Indexed as

AnestheticsElectroretinographyRetinaAnimalsIsofluraneMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPentobarbitalTomography, Optical CoherenceAnestheticsIsofluranePentobarbitalAvertinERGIsofluraneKv8.2 KOPentobarbital sodiumrd10

Identifiers

PMID40374951
PMCPMC12081634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.