Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374939›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implantation: Gruppo Otologico experience after 348 cases.

Luca Morelli, Sachin K Damam, Hailu Yilala M, G Fancello, M Ferraro, A Caruso, M Sanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revision Cochlear Implantation via Middle Turn Insertion in Post-Traumatic Basal Turn Ossification : Revision cochlear implantation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luca Morelli *Department of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Rome, Italy. lucamorellimd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-3103
Sachin K Damam *Vijaya Health Center & Rudh Hearing & Speech Clinic, Bangalore, India.
Hailu Yilala MDepartment of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Rome, Italy.
G FancelloDepartment of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Rome, Italy.
M FerraroENT Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Legnago - Mater Salutis, Verona, Italy.
A CarusoDepartment of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Rome, Italy.
M SannaDepartment of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo discuss indications (unfavorable conditions), surgical steps, complications, and follow-up of subtotal petrosectomy (STP) in cochlear implantation based on our experience of 348 cases. Anatomical variations associated with or without cochlear malformations and differences between electrode insertions were included in our analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective case study was done in Gruppo Otologico (Piacenza, Italy), a quaternary referral center. Among 1002 cases that underwent subtotal petrosectomy, 348 were selected for cochlear implantation in the same setting. The study period was from 2004 to 2019. These patients' clinical and radiological follow-up ranged from 2 months to 180 months. Data were inspected, cleaned, and analyzed by SPSS software.

resultsThe selected group's mean age was 57.236 years, including 178 male and 170 female patients. The follow-up period lasted up to 108.65 months. Out of 348 cases, 8 were children (under the age of 18 years old). Inclusion criteria to be eligible for cochlear implantation in the same setting of subtotal petrosectomy was a preoperative pure tone average (PTA) of more than 90 decibels associated with low speech discrimination ranging from 0% in most cases up to 50% in the minority. 329 patients had a complete electrode insertion intra-operatively. Minor complications were observed in 6 cases. These include one case of implant extrusion due to a middle ear infection leading to labyrinthitis, three cases of post-auricular fistula causing one device failure, one subcutaneous CSF collection, and one subcutaneous seroma collection.

conclusionAlthough in most cases, standardized trans mastoid facial recess technique for cochlear implantation is ideal as the surgical risks are minimal, in complicated cases such as concomitant chronic otitis media, prior canal wall-down cases, radical cavities, or inner ear abnormalities with high risk of cerebrospinal fluid leak subtotal petrosectomy should be the first choice of management with complete disease clearance. Close clinical and radiological follow-up is therefore mandatory. Single-stage implantation is preferred to staging the procedure unless one is unsure of disease clearance.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationPetrous BoneAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantItalyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnatomic variationsChronic otitis mediaCochlear implantsCochlear malformationsCochlear ossificationSubtotal petrosectomy

Identifiers

PMID40374939
PMCPMC12518385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.