ArticleScientific reports2025
fNIRS experimental study on the impact of AI-synthesized familiar voices on brain neural responses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) speech synthesis technology, its application in personalized voice services and its potential role in emotional comfort have become research focal points. This study aims to explore the impact of AI-synthesized familiar and unfamiliar voices on neural responses in the brain. We utilized the GPT-SoVITS project to synthesize three types of voices: a female voice, a sweet female voice, and a maternal voice, all reading the same text. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), we monitored the changes in blood oxygen levels in the prefrontal cortex and temporal cortex of participants during listening, assessing brain activation. The experimental results showed that the AI-synthesized maternal voice significantly activated the participants' prefrontal and temporal cortices. Combined with participants' feedback, the activation of these areas may reflect multidimensional features of voice familiarity processing, including emotion, memory, and cognitive function. This finding reveals the potential applications of AI voice technology in enhancing mental health and user experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.