ArticleDrugs & aging2025
Age Does not Affect the Efficacy of Antibody Drug Conjugates, But is Associated with High-Grade Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Enrolled in Early Phase Clinical Trials.
Article in Drugs & aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inclusion of Older Adults in Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trials: Safety, Efficacy and a Way Forward.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.
objectiveThe objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsAll patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).
resultsA total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).
conclusionsIn our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40374847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.