Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374842›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multifaceted investigation of esfenvalerate-induced toxicity on Allium cepa L.

Onur Sarsar, Oksal Macar, Tuğçe Kalefetoğlu Macar, Kültiğin Çavuşoğlu, Emine Yalçın, Ali Acar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Onur SarsarDepartment of Biology Giresun, Faculty of Science and Art, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Oksal MacarDepartment of Biology Giresun, Faculty of Science and Art, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey. oksal.macar@giresun.edu.tr.
Tuğçe Kalefetoğlu MacarDepartment of Food Technology, Şebinkarahisar School of Applied Sciences, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Kültiğin ÇavuşoğluDepartment of Biology Giresun, Faculty of Science and Art, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Emine YalçınDepartment of Biology Giresun, Faculty of Science and Art, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Ali AcarDepartment of Medical Services and Techniques, Vocational School of Health Services, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the toxicity of the insecticide esfenvalerate in Allium cepa, employing a multifaceted methodology. For this purpose, A. cepa bulbs were organized into four groups, one of which served as the control. The control group was exposed to tap water, while the remaining three groups were exposed to esfenvalerate at concentrations of 0.33 mg/L, 0.64 mg/L and 0.98 mg/L, respectively. The application of the highest dose of 0.98 mg/L esfenvalerate resulted in a significant decrease in physiological parameters, including a 51% reduction in rooting percentage, an 85.3% decrease in root elongation, and a 54.3% decrease in weight gain (p < 0.05). In the esfenvalerate-treated group (0.98 mg/L), a 45.7% decrease in mitotic index was observed, while a significant increase in chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus formation was observed compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The most frequently observed chromosomal abnormalities due to esfenvalerate were sticky chromosome, vagrant chromosome, fragment, unequal distribution of chromatin, bridge, vacuolated nucleus, reverse polarization and multipolar anaphase. Insecticide application could significantly increase the percentage of DNA tails up to 48.3%, as determined by the Comet test (p < 0.05). Exposure to 0.98 mg/L esfenvalerate increased malondialdehyde level (2.75-fold), proline level (1.96-fold), superoxide dismutase activity (1.35-fold), and catalase activity (1.69-fold) while reducing chlorophyll a level (58.18%) and chlorophyll b level (70.35%) (p < 0.05). Molecular docking analysis revealed that esfenvalerate can interact with tubulins, DNA topoisomerases, glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase, protochlorophyllide reductase and DNA molecules. Epidermis and cortex cell damages, cortex cell wall thickening, material accumulation in cortex cells and flattened cell nucleus were recorded as meristematic cell damages due to esfenvalerate. The toxicological profile of esfenvalerate on A. cepa exhibited dose dependence. While esfenvalerate-induced oxidative stress is the most probable cause of toxicity, direct interaction with DNA and other molecules that play a crucial role in maintaining cell integrity may also be among the mechanisms of toxicity. The study's findings emphasize that esfenvalerate poses a risk to non-target organisms, underscoring the need for a reassessment of its regulations and further research into its toxicity.

Indexed as

InsecticidesNitrilesOnionsPyrethrinsChromosome AberrationsMolecular Docking SimulationOxidative StressPlant RootsfenvalerateInsecticidesNitrilesPyrethrinsAllium cepa L.EsfenvalerateGenotoxicityMolecular dockingNon-target organismOxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID40374842
PMCPMC12081867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.