ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
The effect of a whole-heart motion correction algorithm on image quality, calcium score, and risk category classification of non-contrast-enhanced cardiac CT.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effect of a whole-heart motion correction algorithm (Snapshot freeze 2, SSF2) on image quality, calcium score, and risk category classification of non-contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty-one coronary calcium scoring scans performed on a 256-row detector CT were included. Images of standard reconstruction without motion-corrected (STD) and with SSF2 were compared. The image quality was graded by consensus of two experienced radiologists using a four-point Likert scale. The diameter of the major and minor axes at the heaviest point of a dominant calcification, as well as its volume, were measured. The Agatston score, volume score, and corresponding risk category for each patient were recorded. Paired t test, Wilcoxon test, and Bland-Altman plot were used for statistical analysis.
resultsImage quality was significantly improved with SSF2 (P < 0.001). The mean diameters of the major and minor axes were 10.5 ± 5.3 mm and 6.4 ± 6.8 mm for STD images, and 7.2 ± 4.6 mm and 4.2 ± 5.5 mm for SSF2 images, resulting in a mean volume of 149.6 ± 206.1mm
conclusionMotion correction with SSF2 in non-contrast-enhanced cardiac CT improves the image quality at both the patient and lesion level, resulting in a significant reduction in calcium score and risk category downgrade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40374835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.