ReviewLeukemia2025
The evolving landscape of epigenetic target molecules and therapies in myeloid cancers: focus on acute myeloid leukemia and myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Review in Leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From mutational signatures to practice: Artificial intelligence-guided repurposing for blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia.World journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Bromodomain-Driven Regulation of Stem Cells: A Potential Target for Cancer Therapeutic Intervention.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Reshaping tumor immune microenvironment through ROS-responsive prodrug polyplexes via synergistic effect of CRISPRi system and epigenetic inhibitor for breast cancer therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Omics and artificial intelligence integration for stratifying blast crisis CML using COSMIC signatures and pan-cancer precision drug repurposing.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- The histone-methyltransferase DOT1L cooperates with LSD1 to control cell division in blast-phase MPN.Leukemia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on myeloid neoplasms, a field that has been driving scientific advances in cancer for over 50 years, has yielded many discoveries that have fundamentally reshaped our understanding of cancer biology. These insights, often the product of leukemia research, have been instrumental in developing more mechanism-based treatments in the early 2000s [1]. Recognizing epigenetic dysregulation as a common disease mechanism in myeloid cancers has been groundbreaking regarding recent treatment developments that exploit chromatin-based oncogenic mechanisms. In the case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), sequencing studies aimed at assessing the complement of genetic alterations demonstrated that more than 60% of AML cases harbored disease-driving mutations in epigenetic regulators. This high prevalence underscores the importance of epigenetic dysregulation in AML pathogenesis [2, 3]. Chromatin regulators commonly control disease-specific transcriptional programs, making them attractive therapeutic targets to manipulate neoplastic gene expression programs, particularly in myeloid neoplasms. Several drugs targeting epigenetic mechanisms and exploiting myeloid disease-specific dependencies have recently been approved for treating myeloid neoplasms. Many additional drugs are currently being investigated in clinical trials, and numerous new compound developments are being studied in preclinical studies. This manuscript will review (1) chromatin-based disease mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, chromatin regulatory complexes, and histone modifications, currently investigated for therapeutic exploitation in myeloid malignancies, and (2) therapeutic developments already approved or investigated for treating these diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.