ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of high-risk soil erosion areas in the central Yunnan urban agglomeration and the differentiated driving mechanisms compared to the overall agglomeration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Revealing the complex driving mechanisms of soil erosion is essential for assessing regional ecological security. Focusing on the Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration (CYUA), a typical mountainous urban region, this study analyzed the spatiotemporal dynamics of soil erosion from 1990 to 2020 using the RUSLE model and the Improved Stability Mapping (STD) method, identifying high-risk soil erosion areas. Additionally, it applied the OPGD and MGWR models to reveal differentiated driving mechanisms of soil erosion across the urban agglomeration and in high-risk zones. The results indicated that (1) over the past three decades, approximately 27.56% of the CYUA experienced soil erosion, with moderate and high-intensity erosion accounting for 7.04% and 3.83%, respectively. Soil erosion increased continuously from 1990 to 2000 but showed significant improvement after 2000. (2) High-risk areas identified using the improved STD method were primarily distributed along riverbanks, which are highly sensitive to external disturbances. (3) Slope and vegetation were the key factors affecting the overall soil erosion pattern in the urban agglomeration, while rainfall and vegetation were the dominant influencing factors in high-risk areas, where spatial heterogeneity of driving factors was lower than in the general region. (4) Vegetation cover had a significant mitigating effect on soil erosion, making increased vegetation coverage an effective strategy for soil and water conservation. This study provides new insights for soil erosion risk assessment and offers a scientific basis for regional soil erosion control and ecological restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.