ArticleScientific reports2025
Temporal interference stimulation over the motor cortex enhances cortical excitability in rats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temporal Interference Stimulation (TIS) represents a novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique that deeply targets specific brain regions using the differential beat frequency of two high-frequency stimulation pairs. This study investigated the neuromodulatory effects of TIS at different beat frequencies on cortical excitability in the rat motor cortex. Rats were randomly assigned into four groups, receiving TIS at alpha (10 Hz), beta (20 Hz), gamma (70 Hz), or sham frequencies targeting the motor cortex for 20 min under anesthesia. Cortical excitability and inhibition were evaluated by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), input-output (I/O) curves, and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) before and after TIS. Additionally, immunohistochemistry was performed for neural biomarkers c-Fos and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-65) to confirm targeted neural activation following TIS. We also examined glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive cells in the stimulated region to assess astrocyte responses associated with TIS. Alpha and gamma TIS significantly increased MEP amplitudes compared to sham stimulation. The analysis of I/O curves revealed a significant enhancement in the area under the curve (AUC) post-stimulation in the alpha and gamma TIS groups. Notably, only gamma TIS significantly reduced intracortical inhibition, indicated by an increased LICI ratio post-stimulation. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated a significant 35% increase in c-Fos-positive cells in the stimulated motor cortex regions after TIS compared to sham, whereas no significant changes in GAD-65-positive cells or GFAP expression were observed. These findings indicate that a single session of alpha or gamma TIS effectively modulates cortical excitability, highlighting its potential for targeted neuromodulation applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.