ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation and optimal width ratio selection of microbial mineralization technique in the repair of lining cracks in Xinjiang desert open channel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance Evaluation of MICP in Crack Repair: Strength and Durability Enhancement Using Different Bacterial Strains.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The bank slope structure of the open channel in the Xinjiang desert is affected by seasonal climate changes and water erosion, leading to lining cracking. This study identified the optimal culture conditions and mineralization factors for Sporosarcina pasteurii through strain cultivation and precipitation assays. Subsequently, 0.1~5.0 mm wide penetrating concrete cracks were prefabricated, and microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) repair tests were conducted over 16 cycles. These experiments included macroscopic performance evaluations, such as area repair rate, penetration resistance, and capillary water absorption tests, alongside microscopic analyses using X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The results indicate that MICP technology effectively repairs narrow cracks, preserving crack surface integrity, significantly reducing permeability and water absorption, and enhancing the durability of the concrete. However, for cracks exceeding 1.0 mm in width, the repair efficiency declines progressively. Based on the experimental data, it is concluded that a crack width of 1.0 mm is the optimal threshold for effective MICP-based repair within 16 cycles, ensuring both structural integrity and optimal waterproofing. These results offer valuable insights into the potential application of MICP technology for the remediation of lining cracks in the bank slopes of water conveyance channels in Xinjiang Desert.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.