Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374751›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An automated multi parameter neural architecture discovery framework using ChatGPT in the backend.

Md Hafizur Rahman, Zafaryab Haider, Prabuddha Chakraborty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Hafizur RahmanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME, 04469, USA. md.hafizur.rahman@maine.edu.
Zafaryab HaiderDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME, 04469, USA.
Prabuddha ChakrabortyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME, 04469, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2416915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building efficient neural network architectures for a given dataset can be a time-consuming task requiring extensive expert knowledge. This task becomes particularly challenging for edge artificial intelligence (AI) because one has to consider additional parameters such as power consumption during inferencing, model size, and inferencing speed. In this article, we introduce a novel framework designed to automatically discover new neural network architectures based on user-defined parameters, an expert system, and an LLM trained on a large amount of open-domain knowledge. The proposed framework (LEMONADE) can be easily used by non-AI experts, does not require a predetermined neural architecture search space, and considers a large set of edge AI parameters. We implement and validate this proposed neural architecture discovery framework using CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet16-120, EuroSAT, Malaria Parasite, and IMDb datasets while primarily using ChatGPT-4o as the LLM component. We have also explored the possibilities of using Gemini-Pro as the LLM component. Neural networks generated using LEMONADE for CIFAR-10 ([Formula: see text] test accuracy) and CIFAR-100 ([Formula: see text] test accuracy) demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in terms of final model accuracy. We have also observed near state-of-the-art performance (in terms of accuracy) for the ImageNet16-120 dataset. Moreover LEMONADE was able to generate effective neural networks, satisfying different edge AI requirements across additional datasets such as EuroSAT.

Identifiers

PMID40374751
PMCPMC12081892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.