ArticleScientific reports2025
The analysis of entrepreneurship evaluation system for talent cultivation in artistic creativity and animation under artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of a Big Data-Driven Predictive Analysis Platform for Hospital Talent Attrition.Blockchain in healthcare today · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aims to explore the application of artistic creativity using deep learning (DL) and artificial intelligence (AI) in the evaluation system of innovation and entrepreneurship. Moreover, this work intends to propose a new perspective for talent cultivation in animation majors in higher education institutions. Addressing the strong subjectivity and lack of quantitative indicators in traditional artistic creativity evaluation methods, this work constructs an artistic creativity innovation evaluation model based on the Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) integrated with the Style-Based Generative Adversarial Network (StyleGAN) algorithm. After preprocessing the artistic creativity image data, the data are input into the BPNN and StyleGAN fusion model. The model training uses the Adam optimizer, with 120 iterations set, and incorporates Dropout layers during training to enhance the model's generalization ability. The performance of the model is evaluated, revealing that it outperforms existing technologies in indicators such as loss function value, fitting effect, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, with an accuracy of up to 96.30%. Additionally, this work explores the potential application of this model in talent cultivation in animation majors in higher education institutions, providing new teaching tools and methods to enhance students' innovation ability and practical skills. Therefore, this work offers a new technical means for artistic creativity evaluation and provides important references and guidance for innovation in higher education art education models and talent cultivation in the animation industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.