Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hemodialysis pathway types influence wound healing complications and survival in end-stage renal disease patients in a retrospective cohort study.

Jie Ding, Jun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie DingHemodialysis Ward, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, No. 216 Guanshan Avenue, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Jun LiHemodialysis Ward, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, No. 216 Guanshan Avenue, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China. lijunduoduo@163.com.

Funding

the Medical Research Project Fund of Wuhan Municipal Health Commission WZ18D03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of different hemodialysis access types-central venous catheter (CVC), arteriovenous graft (AVG), and autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF)-on wound healing, complication rates, and long-term survival in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A retrospective analysis of 323 ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis over a ten-year period revealed significant differences in outcomes across the three groups. AVF patients experienced the shortest wound healing times and the highest dialysis efficacy, while the CVC group had the highest infection and reoperation rates. Although there were no significant differences in cardiac function or cause-specific mortality, AVF patients had the longest median survival time, followed by those in the CVC and AVG groups. These findings suggest that while AVF provides superior dialysis efficiency and survival outcomes with fewer complications, patient suitability and individual health conditions must be carefully considered when selecting the appropriate vascular access for hemodialysis.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisWound HealingAdultAgedArteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalCentral Venous CathetersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEnd-stage renal diseaseHemodialysis pathwayLife cycleRetrospective studyWound healing

Identifiers

PMID40374699
PMCPMC12081909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.