ArticleScientific reports2025
End-to-end Chinese clinical event extraction based on large language model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A joint span-entity prediction approach with generative and cross-lingual meta-learning for low-resource Japanese NER.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical event extraction is crucial for structuring medical data, supporting clinical decision-making, and enabling other intelligent healthcare services. Traditional approaches for clinical event extraction often use pipeline-based methods to identify event triggers and elements. However, these methods commonly suffer from error propagation and information loss, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this challenge, this paper proposes an end-to-end clinical event extraction method based on the large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we transform the clinical event extraction task into an end-to-end text generation task and design a prompt learning method based on the LLMs called LMCEE. Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement over traditional pipeline methods, with the F1 score increasing by 12%. Additionally, the proposed method outperforms the generative-based method named UIE, showcasing a 5.7% improvement in F1 score. However, the experimental results also disclose certain limitations of the proposed method, such as its sensitivity to prompt templates and its heavy dependence on the type of LLMs. These findings highlight the need for further investigation and optimization to enhance performance and robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.